Hey, so serious question, have you thought about making this language bidirectional?

If it's supposed to be a learning resource, that would allow students to process rust and at least begin to understand what it means?

▲

tristenharr 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Yes, absolutely! I definitely want to look into this, although it's not the top of the current roadmap.

To me, the first step is going to be to really work through and trying to get this right. Do user studies. Watch people write code in this. Watch people with lots of experience, and people with none get tossed into a project written in the LOGOS and told nothing.

Once the language surface is more solid and not as likely to go through major changes, I want to focus our efforts in that direction.

	▲	Folcon 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Don't take this the wrong way, but my understanding was that you're vibe coding it? If that's the case I'd do this from day 1, your parser should be a 1 to 1 mapping of some text to code, this you can easily and rigourously test, then if you want to, you can do other stuff on top

▲

yumberjack 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I like this idea a lot…