An LLM is just an agent. The principal is held accountable. There’s nothing really all that novel here from a liability perspective.

That was my point exactly. I just didn’t write it as precisely as you.

	▲	otterley 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Then I don’t understand. My point was that it doesn’t matter whether the machine or the human actually wrote the code; liability for any injury ultimately remains with the human that put the agent to work. Similarly, if a developer at a company wrote code that injured you, and she wrote that code at the direction of the company, you don’t sue the developer, you sue the company.