Well you can "work to live" in a nice big house, with a nanny, eating steaks, flying business class to ski in the alps or scuba in the Galapagos... I think it takes a lot of money before you feel like you don't need more money.

▲

mhss 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Not at all. Most people can be super happy with less than the average tech salary (at a point where they don't feel they need more if it comes at the expense of work life balance, time with family, job satisfaction, etc).

▲

wiseowise 3 days ago | parent [-]

I’ll never understand this WHY X - BECAUSE Y - WELL Y IS TOO MUCH, Z IS MORE THAN ENOUGH comment trifecta. Obviously a lot of people are not super happy, otherwise they wouldn’t kiss asses and play politics to get more money.

	▲	xnickb a day ago \| parent [-]
		You are responding to a "money != happiness" comment with "people kiss asses to get more money because they're unhappy". Just saying.

▲

ktzar 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Just that all of those activities you mention feel like a useless life compared to spending time with your own children in a house big enough for everyone to have their space, but small enough to force you to feel you're living with each other, seeing them grow and thrive, and going around your closest nature patch.

Not much money is needed to have a fulfilling and worth-living life.

▲

BeetleB 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Other than the big house, which can easily be achieved in much of the country, nothing in the list above incentivizes me to either work harder or kids ass.

	▲	anon84873628 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Sure, lots of people don't care about those things and therefore don't shape their careers to get them. But some do, and that's what we're talking about. Though to be clear I should have said "it can take a lot of money..."