| ▲ | wrs 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Some anecdata: This weekend as a lark I asked Claude Code to design a (fairly simple) analog circuit and simulate it in LTSpice to verify. It did three edit-simulate-fix cycles and to my surprise ended up with something that seemed pretty sane. That said, schematics (as opposed to netlists) don't seem to be a practical I/O format yet. It did generate a KiCad schematic file when asked, but it was pretty bad (penguin on a bicycle level). Anyway, somehow there does seem to be some electronic tools training happening, becuase I tried this maybe a year ago and it was pretty hopeless. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wafflesfreak 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This is exactly why the first version of our tool worked with netlists only. We've since evolved to parsing the full KiCad project and generating a netlist from it so we can also extract schematic-specific metadata that doesn't make it into the netlist (designer notes/annotations, component positions, etc.) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | asauter 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
cool, how did you connect claude to ltspice? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||