| ▲ | NewsaHackO 3 days ago | |||||||
That is a normal, run of the mill sentence. | ||||||||
| ▲ | friendzis 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yes, for an LLM. The good thing about LLMs is that they can infer patterns. The bad thing about LLMs is that they infer patterns. The patterns change a bit over time, but the overuse of certain language patterns remains a constant. One could argue that some humans write that way, but ultimately it does not matter if the text was generated by an LLM, reworded by a human in a semi-closed loop or organically produced by human. The patterns indicate that the text is just a regurgitation of buzzwords and it's even worse if an LLM-like text was produced organically. | ||||||||
| ▲ | croemer 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I can't prove it of course but I stand by it. | ||||||||
| ||||||||