So glad I’m not the only one that noticed that.

There’s some really solid insights here, but the editing with AI to try to make up for an imperfect essay just makes the points they’re trying to convey less effective.

The lines between what is the author’s ideas and what is AI trying to finish a half or even mostly baked idea just removes so much of the credibility.

And it’s completely counter to the “clarity vs cleverness” idea and the just get something out there instead of trying to get it perfect.