I am familiar with NLP and persuasion techniques, and when I started feeling it creep in as I read this story, I started skimming. I have learned that a compelling vision alone does not mean it is correct or even wise.

The analogy is not correct. I know that burger is rich in taste and marvelous. It is also my opinion that it is an illusion, and lacks substance.

There is so much more to the cosmos than science, though I get that this is the current preoccupation of our civilization. Maybe one day, people will expand their consciousness beyond science the way the main character expanded her’s to communicate with aliens. Until then, I recognize I am in the minority here in HN with this view.

▲

GolDDranks 3 days ago | parent [-]

Where in the story does NLP (I guess you mean "Neurolinguistic programming" and not "Natural Language Processing") factor in?

▲

hosh 3 days ago | parent [-]

It isn’t in the content of the story, but in the craft of storywriting itself. The author does not have to know these to make use of the methods identified by NLP. Rhetoric (as a study in and of itself) and persuasion has long been studied and practiced by humanity.

	▲	solenoid0937 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I do not understand why you'd intentionally close your mind to persuasive arguments. Sure, let's say the author does use NLP. What of it?
	▲	procaryote 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As I understand it, NLP is pseudoscience. Rhetoric and persuation has long been studied by humanity, but that doesn't make NLP real