No no no - 2 definitions of user here. The idea is that the venue only has to cover the burn of $FIND for every instance of the video being served.

So, let's reframe this.

You go to hospital. Theoretically by this point, the tech is integrated with Epic MyCharts - once you enter the geofence of the hospital, you are sent an SMS message that guides you straight from the parking lot right to radiology.

The video is served, you use the route to arrive at radiology.

The hospital is covering the burn. The creator is getting paid royalty on the remint

As the patient, you never even know that any of that is happening

I probably need to reword that.

In my brain it makes sense but I get that is worded confusing

Accessibility is definitely critical to me tho

Core functionality and the most important imo is voice narration for vision impaired. Translated into native device language. Hasn't been implemented yet, but if done correctly by the creator, a mobility toggle becomes available that can serve best route for those who might be wheelchair bound

Make more sense?

To me yes, it helps. It's still very complicated and I see no way of finding out how your solution really looks like for the actual end user of it, without getting a doctorate on blockchain and devops.

Could you at least add a video that shows the user's experience?