| ▲ | tayo42 4 days ago |
| Game of thrones will be. No main character is safe since Ned Stark was killed on TV. No ending was going to be good. Sopranos had a controversial ending too. Silicon Valley captured the feel of the bay area and did a good job with satire. 2000s would be easier, I think 2010 is about the switch to super hero movies. |
|
| ▲ | KPGv2 4 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| No one even talks about GOT anymore bc the ending was so bad. > No ending was going to be good Why do you say that? Plenty amazing shows have great endings. And GOT isn't some uniquely incredible story. Killing MCs is not new to GOT, either, and you give that show too much credit. Lost did it long before GOT. 24. Grey's Anatomy is SUPER famous for it. They killed off like half the original cast in a single helicopter crash. ASOIAF wasn't original bc it killed MCs. It was original bc it treated fantasy as political first, fantasy second. |
| |
| ▲ | tayo42 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | None of those shows were a pop culture phenomenon like got was when it was on. It only ended a few years ago. The office took over 10 years to have a popularity resurgence. | | |
| ▲ | Izkata 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Lost was for its first season or two. It just got steadily worse instead of suddenly worse like Game of Thrones. |
| |
| ▲ | incompatible 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Perhaps George R. R. Martin will finish the books some day, and we'll find out how he thinks it should end. | | |
| ▲ | ceejayoz 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I’m starting to think he was honest that this was his intended ending, and he’s given up as a result. | | |
| ▲ | AngryData 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't doubt that the show ending mirrors the book's intended ending, however a huge part of it is how you get to that ending, which they rushed and fumbled horribly in the show. Like Bran becoming King could work, but not when he basically shows up out of nowhere and nobody knows anything that happened to him or what he is capable of, he basically disappeared for years and when he came back he said a few nonsense things but wasn't involved in much of the politicing that could make him a viable candidate for King. Or Dany going full Mad King, after they spend seasons showing her trying to not be a crazy ruler but then suddenly snapping, instead of going through a series of harder and harder choices that turn out worse each time and drive her to more relatable desperation and violence. At minimum they needed a full extra season and a full final season, if not more. But without GRRM handholding them throughout the entire plot they completely lost the path. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | auntienomen 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| There is a good ending to Game of Thrones: evil wins, everyone dies. All the fools who pursued their own interests rather than face an annihilating threat get annihilated. It's right there in the show's motto. "Winter is coming." The writers just lacked the courage to do it. They tried to tack a Disney ending onto a tragedy. |
| |
| ▲ | rkomorn 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Either that or Cersei being queen would've been the correct ending. The Lannisters would've had the only real army left without that WWE-style defeat of the Night King. Cersei's consistently outwitted everyone (except Tommen, I guess), and they knew how to buy loyalty. Instead we ended up with the usual plot armor, and a "twist" that the character that behaved like a tyrannical zealot for 7+ seasons was, in fact, a tyrannical zealot. |
|
