Alex2037 4 days ago

what the fuck are you talking about? SO, remarkably, did not get enshittified.

They're trying really hard now. Constant attempts to introduce half-baked AI features that the meta community doesn't want. Posts from staff (i.e., actual employees of Stack Exchange, Inc.; not the unpaid moderators) on the meta site rarely if ever get a positive score in the last few years.

▲

hahn-kev 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah I agree, it did fail, but it's not worse because the people running it were trying to ring money out of it's users. Maybe they did take their eye off the ball trying to make it something else though

▲

casey2 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Probably about https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336526/stack-overfl... and the ensuing shitstorm

▲

gfhifd42 4 days ago | parent [-]

Nah. Farther back in time and psychologically deeper. Its in my, very short, comment history.

They told their community their motivation was to combat the selfish monetization of digital sharecroppers and then they monetized their digital sharecroppers.

They are frauds and eventually frauds are exposed and they exposed themselves for $1.8billion.

And SO it collapsed.

But thanks for speaking for me. Albeit incorrectly, ironically.

	▲	stingraycharles 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		It would help if you provide actual arguments to support your claims that SO was enshittified due to monetization efforts. The selling of SO itself is no evidence that they’re actually making the experience worse. You’re making bold claims of them being frauds, selling out the community, etc but provide nothing to support these claims.