> If by "body-slammed" you mean "trained on SO user data while violating the terms of the CC BY-SA license", then sure.

You know that's not what they meant, but why bring up the license here? If they were over the top compliant, attributing every SO answer under every chat, and licensing the LLM output as CC BY-SA, I think we'd still have seen the same shift.

> In the best case scenario, LLMs might give you the same content you were able to find on SO. In the common scenario, they'll hallucinate an answer and waste your time.

Best case it gives you the same level of content, but more customized, and faster.

SO being wrong and wasting your time is also common.