| ▲ | CyberDildonics 4 days ago | |||||||
It seems great to have something that is C but cleaned up, although clay had all that with templates and move semantics. I think leaving out move semantics and destructors is inexcusable at this point. It is not only fundamental, but doesn't affect things like standard libraries, runtimes, or ABIs. | ||||||||
| ▲ | lerno 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
But it of course move semantics and destructors affect all things. If the goal is to call and be callable from C without special constructs, how would you make the C code respect the move semantics and destructors? | ||||||||
| ||||||||