Quite cool to see this space being explored! https://github.com/headwaymaps/headway is another related project.

Nice - thanks for the pointer. Headway is definitely a related "self-hosted maps stack" project.

One place Corviont is trying to differentiate is the update story for edge/fleet deployments: the goal is a signed, resumable regional dataset updater (verify manifest -> atomic swap -> reload/rollback) so boxes in the field can stay fresh without manual rebuilds or "re-download the world" updates. Headway (at least from a quick skim) looks more like "bring your own data / regenerate when needed," which is totally fine for servers, but fleets usually need something more automated.

If you've seen Headway (or similar) handle incremental/regional updates well, I'd love to learn from it - updater design is the big missing piece I'm validating demand for.

▲

ikawe 4 days ago | parent [-]

(Headway maintainer here)

Indeed there is currently no incremental update in Headway, and deployments are largely an exercise left to the reader.

For maps.earth (a Headway planet deployment), I typically rebuild the world, and then do a blue/green deployment.

I guess the one exception is for transit routing. We have individual transit zones small enough to fit into memory, which can be deployed incrementally. There’s nothing really built in about it - just another level of indirection via our “travelmux” service which redirects your routing queries to a different backend depending on mode and region.

▲

packet_mover 4 days ago | parent [-]

Thanks for chiming in - super helpful context.

I am trying to learn from real deployments as I design Corviont's updater for edge boxes (bandwidth caps, maintenance windows, unreliable WAN, atomic swap + rollback).

When you say transit "zones" are small enough to deploy incrementally - what is the actual artifact per zone (roughly what format), and what sizes do you typically see?

And when a transit zone dataset changes, how do you roll that out safely - do you restart/reload the backend that serves that zone, or do you bring up a new backend/version and then flip travelmux to point at it?

▲

ikawe 4 days ago | parent [-]

Transit routing is provided by OpenTripPlanner, so the deployment artifact is their OTP serialized graph format.

So it’s not really incremental with respect to the existing transit zone deployment. I just mean I can redeploy a single transit zone with the latest GTFS without having to touch the other transit zones, tileserver, geocoder, etc.

Deployment/rollback is handled by k8s config.

	▲	packet_mover 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Thank you, that's very helpful.