It's linked right above in this chain. I am not going to discuss why killing people is intolerant. That's just silly even for hn standards.

▲

lukan 2 hours ago | parent [-]

You edited your post after I commented and there was nothing about killing there before. (Just something about haters)

Indeed not HN standards. And if Joshua said killing people is good, I am interested in a full quote.

▲

anotheryou an hour ago | parent | next [-]

also interested in the source. read a compilation of mails and this was not in there.

▲

BoredPositron an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

If you are going to defend someone you have no or very distant association with like you stated in another reply. Maybe just maybe read what everyone else is talking about, in this chain it would be his email exchange with epstein. Thanks for making ME read that pseudo intellectual shit again so YOU don't have to.

"too many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense is the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if the brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent."

https://www.jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413?view=i...

EDIT: There was no comment before I edited mine. @dang can probably timestamp it if you want to make a fuss about.

▲

lukan 44 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

"EDIT: There was no comment before I edited mine. @dang can probably timestamp it if you want to make a fuss about."

Dang would just flag us both if we make a fuss here.

And what you apparently mean is, that when you started to edit your comment, my answer wasn't there. But it was already, after you edited.

Anyway, I am fine with calling this part a missunderstanding.

▲

lukan an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe present the full quote?

The radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism is fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could pull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that everybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable"

He dares to explore radical taboo ideas and concludes that it would be fascism, which he is not comfortable with.

So .. I see nothing where he is intolerant of anything. But you seem not tolerant for people daring to explore certain thoughts in general? Even if they reach the conclusion this is not the way to go. (And maybe even an attempt at dissuading the other person of those concepts)

	▲	BoredPositron 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		That's why I didn't want to quote anything because it's just deteriorating into a debate club about hypotheticals. I am absolutely intolerant to people who are fine with entertaining ideas about eradicating people to fix problems we could fix without classicide. I don't care if it's hypothetical or not there was no need for it (which makes them intolerant for me maybe I am a bit extreme here but so be it), it was only to appease. Especially if you do so in an email exchange with a known rapist/human trafficker because you want more of his money.