| ▲ | Izkata 7 hours ago | |||||||
And combined with -E, it'll quit immediately if the output is smaller than the terminal size. ...And combined with some of the other options in the post, my go-to has been "less -SEXIER" for a long time. Specifying E twice doesn't seem to do anything except make this easier to remember. | ||||||||
| ▲ | jlokier 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I recommend -FX instead of -EX. They both quit immediately if the output is smaller than the screen size, but -FX does not quit if the output is larger and you jump to the end of a large file, so you can continue to do things like scroll back or search. git uses "less -FRX" by default. This is how I learned about -F. (To be pedentic, git uses "LESS=FRX less", which accomplishes the same thing.) | ||||||||
| ▲ | marcosdumay 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I'm reading it correctly that it will cause less to exit if you scroll until the end of file even if the file is larger than the terminal size? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | kccqzy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I hate -E. Quitting immediately does not do good things to my muscle memory. I’m using to hitting q to quit less when I am done. Now the q key becomes part of the input to the shell prompt (or worse if there’s a different tool invoking less and now q might be interpreted differently by that tool). I value the consistency of user interaction more than saving a keystroke. | ||||||||