| ▲ | zahlman 10 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
This seems to be, in effect, advertising for a book about how to use the underlying FOSS software to do this. I would be okay with that as a monetization model, except that the book author despite being a self-described FOSS dev doesn't seem to have anything to do with the project (https://github.com/beancount/beancount/graphs/contributors). Ah, not quite true. The author fixed a typo in a docstring once (https://github.com/beancount/beancount/commit/8584763b618f76...). | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mtlynch 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Aside from the fact that writing a book about Beancount is a positive contribution, the author maintains a list of Beancount resources[0] and has written several beancount plugins.[1, 2, 3, 4] I have personally benefited from his contributions to the Beancount ecosystem. Can you point to some of your contributions to this project? [0] https://github.com/siddhantgoel/awesome-beancount [1] https://github.com/siddhantgoel/beancount-n26 [2] https://github.com/siddhantgoel/beancount-ing | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | veltas 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
If you look at their personal profile they've made a lot of content with activity and collaboration outside of the main beancount repo, related to beancount. They definitely meet the criteria for 'FOSS dev' in that it's FOSS, too. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | OJFord 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
And only... what, Italians, can write books on the Romans? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fragmede 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Oh no, someone might make some money off work they did that was related to work a different somebody did! What a travesty! Somebody stop him! I know money is the root of all evil and all that, but a total aversion to it isn't a very healthy way of interfacing with it at all. | |||||||||||||||||