| ▲ | schnetzlerjoe 9 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
No I guess not. I just asked it. Your answer: Why Tasker is a good name Instantly understandable “Tasker” clearly communicates automation, jobs, actions, workflows Zero explanation needed — huge plus for a consumer + SMB product Broad enough to scale Works for: Desktop agent Cloud cron jobs HTTP-triggered automations AI agents running tasks for sales, ops, HVAC estimates, etc. Doesn’t lock you into just AI or just workflows Matches your positioning Given what you’ve built: non-technical, consumer-friendly automation powered by AI Tasker fits that perfectly — especially compared to over-clever AI names. I think that answers your question lmao | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | blackqueeriroh 9 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It’s great and I love it and don’t change the name! | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | netsharc 9 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
OK, since you've apparently delegated all thinking to AI ("lmao"), can you ask it this: "What if there's already an established app called Tasker for Android" Plus what I said about the potential confusion of users? In another reply above you said "...if I were to take it seriously".. God fucking damnit, add this to my 2026 resolutions: ignore people putting up vibe-coded slop onto Show HN. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||