Linux is a viable alternative to Windows/MacOS if you stand back and squint.

Not up close due to the vast number of inconsistencies.

This could only be fixed by a user experience built from the ground up by a single company.

9763468975325 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Spoken like a true Windows UX aficionado. Who doesn't love multiple system settings apps, a mix of minimal new context menus and overcrowded legacy context menus just one more click away.

▲

tredre3 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> Who doesn't love multiple system settings apps, a mix of minimal new context menus and overcrowded legacy context menus just one more click away.

I get that you're making a Windows joke, but this describes Linux equally well.

	▲	p_ing 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Actually having just installed OpenSuSe w/ KDE, certain right click menus just generate errors OOTB, or control panels flat out don't work. The UX leaves a lot to be desired.

▲

yunnpp 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

To be clear, are you suggesting Windows is the standard of consistency?

Even modern macs fall short of the UX Apple has traditionally been known for...

▲

jaapz an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have you worked with windows recently? It basically consists entirely of inconsistensies

▲

regularfry 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Only true if those inconsistencies actually matter to your workflow. Not going to deny that they exist, obviously, but their impact is largely overplayed (and gratuitously downplayed on Windows, in my experience).

▲

wewewedxfgdf 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes Windows also sadly has become very inconsistent.

MacOS is highly consistent compared to Windows.

Perhaps Linux operating systems like Steam or ChromeOS might finally create a beautiful and consistent UI.

	▲	lawn 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		KDE is vastly better than Windows already.

▲

WolfeReader 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Please give an example of an "inconsistency" which makes Linux not a "viable alternative to Windows/MacOS"