Remix.run Logo
valleyer 6 hours ago

Lawyers, admins, and executives, sure. But what about the complexity on the engineers who now have to maintain an exploding matrix of modes? I can definitely see that becoming burdensome.

davnicwil 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

much has been written about the deteriorating quality of iOS.

There's bluntly not strong external evidence that software quality is a driving priority at Apple in recent years, so it most probably follows that concerns about maintainability aren't either.

xp84 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You’re not wrong, it is burdensome but the sheer volume of money they secure primarily because of their license to rent-seek mercilessly (in the US especially because it’s the market they dominate most and with the weakest regulators) makes even a hilarious amount of complexity supportable. Besides, it’s mainly the users who suffer from the codebase falling apart, not Apple decision makers.

SheinhardtWigCo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

$500k+ TC makes many burdens worth shouldering

npunt 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

they make $1b in revenue and $300mm a day in profit

theplatman 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Engineers say they want to work on hard problems then complain that they can’t solve something because it’s too complex

MrMetric 5 hours ago | parent [-]

The difference is this isn't an inherently hard problem. It's just stupidity. The difficulty is not inherently interesting, because it's all made up.

xp84 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Seconded, compliance-induced complexity is the most asinine and tedious possible application of programming skills.

abacadaba 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

sounds like a problem for claude to worry about