| ▲ | malshe 7 hours ago |
| I bought BYD stock in 2025 before split in the hope that their market dominance will translate to great returns. The stock has pretty consistently traded down since then. Meanwhile Tesla stock soared purely on the air coming out of Elon’s mouth. |
|
| ▲ | ralph84 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Auto manufacturing is low margin and capital intensive. BYD is valued as an auto manufacturer. Tesla is not. Even all of that aside, the idea that foreign investors will be allowed to meaningfully participate in the upside of Chinese companies is questionable. Every Chinese company is one recapitalization away from zeroing out the common stock owned by foreigners. What are they gonna do, sue in Chinese court? |
| |
| ▲ | toomuchtodo 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | For quite some time, Warren Buffett was a BYD investor via Berkshire Hathaway. If you tried to get into EV stocks after the Tesla exuberance started, you were already mostly too late. > The filing by Berkshire’s energy subsidiary recorded the value of its BYD investment as zero as of the end of March, down from $415 million at the end of 2024. > Buffett’s company began investing in Shenzhen-based BYD in 2008, when it paid $230 million for about 225 million shares, equivalent to a 10% stake at the time. > It began selling those shares in 2022 after BYD’s share price had risen more than twentyfold. Warren Buffett’s fund exits BYD after a 17-year investment that grew over 20-fold in value - https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/22/investing/warren-buffet-berks... - September 22nd, 2025 | | |
| ▲ | profsummergig an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | This is fascinating, because from what I've heard, Warren Buffett did not favor tech stocks. Does anyone know what gave Buffett the faith that this company was a real deal? | | |
| ▲ | holmesch 10 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It was Charlie Munger who became enthusiastic about BYD after learning about it from investor Li Lu, leading him to convince Buffett to make Berkshire Hathaway's $230 million investment in 2008. | |
| ▲ | jimbokun 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Maybe he was more afraid of software dominated stocks? BYD is at heart an automobile manufacturer and so maybe he felt more confident evaluating it using his normal tools. | |
| ▲ | dalyons an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | They “just” were a battery company then. Is that considered tech? |
| |
| ▲ | Seattle3503 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | That investment predates Xi Jinping's leadership. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | mullingitover 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| In the combination Keynesian Beauty Contest[1] and casino that passes for an equity market in the US, everyone knows that Tesla is ugly as hell, but everyone also knows that everyone knows that it will get votes, so the show goes on. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_beauty_contest |
|
| ▲ | Etheryte 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is the story of nearly every Chinese stock ever. Their market is very different and even simple intuitions don't carry over. |
| |
| ▲ | culi 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Anytime China targets an industry we get a situation where basically every major city has their own brand that they're backing. There's a lot more competition in China compared to western markets that tend to be dominated by a few major players. There's over 100 EV brands in China today, e.g. BYD (Shenzhen), NIO (Hefei), GAC Aion (Guangzhou), and SAIC (Shanghai) There's been a lot written about China's "Fiscal Federalism" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01475... | | |
| ▲ | narrator 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | How they do financial bailouts by printing their own debt-free money and having fine-grained control of the banking system is also something that the west doesn't do. | |
| ▲ | next_xibalba an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | They usually go through a major, government driven consolidation phase to establish a handful of national champions. I would bet we’ll see the same in EVs. This ensures scale by which they can dominate the global industry-an explicit target of the CCP. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | dd36 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s stock manipulation. |
|
| ▲ | newyankee 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| No AI, self driving hype in BYD |
| |
| ▲ | culi 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | BYD's self-driving is free and much more widely available. Not to mention it uses LiDAR. I'm not gonna get into whether or not their God's Eye is better or worse than Tesla's FSD but it's at least widely acknowledged that they are at least comparable. Tesla is also not very transparent so it's hard to cite statistics but a recent study found that Tesla had the highest rate of fatal accidents of any brand in the US https://www.iseecars.com/most-dangerous-cars-study |
|
|
| ▲ | viktorcode 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| For the major part BYD sales performance is dependent on government subsidies in the country where they sell three quarters of all the cars they produce. That is a high risk factor investors don't like. |
|
| ▲ | hn_throwaway_99 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent." But as another comment pointed out, they have tons of debt, and TFA states that their "revised" target was revised downward, meaning earlier stock valuations were priced for higher sales. |
|
| ▲ | paxys 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The Chinese economy isn't set up to endlessly create value for the capital-owning class, so you are never going to profit off of Chinese companies and stocks in the way we are used to in the west. |
|
| ▲ | lossolo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Chinese stock market is very different than US. In US you have like 62% of Americans reporting owning stock (including via mutual funds/retirement accounts) and in China, it's single digits participation.
And China's market is famously retail heavy one, there were some studies showing that Shanghai Stock Exchange retail trading is 80%+ of volume vs ~10% in the US. There is less hype and they are also not affected as much as US if stock goes down or stays flat. |
| |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The Shanghai stock exchange is still too heavy on insider trading, and consumer investors feel it is more like gambling than investing. Like, you could wager some money on a mahjong game, or you could blindly pick a stock and hope you can get some money by riding in the wake of a connected insider trader. If you just want to invest money, there is real estate or investing in a family member’s business. Pensions and other institutions in need of safe (in aggregate) investments won’t go near the SSE yet. China is doing more things right but still has a long way to go on other things. |
|
|
| ▲ | nutjob2 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Meanwhile Tesla stock soared purely on the air coming out of Elon’s mouth. Wrong orifice. |
|
| ▲ | dzhiurgis 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Chinese stocks don’t seem to follow any reality either. BYD is basically flat over 5 years. |
| |
| ▲ | Tiktaalik 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The explanation that I'm finding more and more compelling is that this is because there's actual competition in China, whereas in the west conglomerates have been able to carve up the market into fiefdoms and feast, with increasing amounts of cash that they can funnel into dividends and buybacks. From the NA vehicle POV it doesn't look healthy. Stocks of the major auto makers have done well this year, while product gets more and more expensive and limited. Barely seems possible to buy anything but a F150like anymore. | | |
| ▲ | phatfish 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Western corporations optimise for share price. The way to do that is by pulling strings at the government level to block your competitors and by getting nice tax breaks; not by having the best product for the consumer. China and Chinese companies still want to shake off the "China means bad quality" image, so they actually want to make a great product at a good price for the consumer. To-the-moon share price growth doesn't happen by giving your customers a good deal. Also the CCP doesn't want corporations forgetting who calls the shots, so there is some internal pressure keeping things less "frothy" than Western markets (where most governments are running scared of the big global corps). | |
| ▲ | thesmtsolver2 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Outside of EVs and more broadly China rates near the bottom for market freedom https://gfmag.com/data/economic-freedom-by-country/ If the broader market is rigged, investors don’t rush in for just one segment. | | |
| ▲ | culi 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's not so much that the broader market is rigged. It's that every major industrial hub funds its own player: BYD (Shenzhen), NIO (Hefei), GAC Aion (Guangzhou), SAIC (Shanghai), etc. It might seem "rigged" to a westerner because it's so subsidized but China has a LOT of industrial hubs and therefore a lot of competition. The US also heavily subsidizes EVs but the subsidies mostly only go to one company. Just take a look at the mind-boggling amount of subsidies we've given to Tesla both federally and on a state-by-state basis. Nevada's almost 2$ billion being the most blatant https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/tesla-inc | |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | bparsons 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Interesting definition of freedom. The top three countries happen to be the places most permissive to international tax dodgers. | | |
| ▲ | Sayrus 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > produced by the Heritage Foundation > Twelve are the factors related to four key aspects of the economic environment that are graded from 0 to 100 and averaged to determine a country’s score: rule of law (and related sub-categories: property rights, government integrity, judicial effectiveness); government size (government spending, tax burden, fiscal health); regulatory efficiency (business, labor and monetary freedom); open markets (trade, investment and financial freedom). Quite the definition they made up. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | bobthepanda 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You could say that about the Chinese stock market in general. Neither the SSE Composite nor the Hang Seng correlate all that well with Chinese GDP growth. | |
| ▲ | bparsons 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Chinese companies are optimized to grow and build stuff. US companies are optimized to deliver returns to shareholders. | | |
| ▲ | bobthepanda 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Chinese stocks have historically done poorly due to poor governance and auditing failures. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | omarforgotpwd 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [flagged] |
| |
|
| ▲ | thegreatpeter 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Purely on the air coming out of Elon’s mouth as well as the 1 million cars sold world wide, 165 successful Falcon 9 launches and 9 million Starlink subscriptions |
| |
| ▲ | sgerenser 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | SpaceX’s success have no bearing on Tesla. And Tesla’s sales for the year are down for the second year in a row. Hardly a logical reason for the stock to go up. | |
| ▲ | csto12 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nice. Now take the car sales out of the vacuum and let’s see how great sales look year over across the world. Now let’s factor in how Elon’s government ended subsidies for electric cars. Should I go on? |
|
|
| ▲ | NooneAtAll3 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| your very mistake was trading stocks at all stocks and the whole money-as-a-business is US thing - making actual product is the China thing |