Can we donate to creative individuals like the OP so they keep making amazing stuff? This is the kind of output LLMs will not be able to produce any time soon.

▲

sho_hn 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"Make a Bartosz-style website about $topic" seems like a fun benchmark idea. Maybe more so than pelicans on bicycles.

To be honest, though, this seems like ideal content for an LLM to produce. It's basically fact regurgitation.

▲

dpark 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> It's basically fact regurgitation.

This page wasn’t a regurgitation of facts. It was filled with custom interactive applets that let you explore the effects of physical changes. The core value proposition here is not the facts but the ability to explore and intuit the physics.

	▲	sho_hn 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I do understand the contention is that an LLM would be less thoughtful in editorializing which bits to make interactive, reasoning about the progression in understanding and delight by the user. I'm not so sure it's that far out of reach, though. From what I've seen the reasoning models do, they're not too far away from being able to run a strategy of figuring out interesting increments of a problem, parameterizing them, making an interactive scene for those parameters, ... it feels within reach.

▲

macintux 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

He has a Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ciechanowski