Yes, they do this, and it's really not an unreasonable requirement.

Of course. It's just a coincidence that they're placing onerous restrictions on competi- I mean alternative browser engines. Restrictions which, of course, they're not obliged to follow themselves.

I am sure that Apple will make no other efforts to impede others from unwalling the garden. That would be completely ridiculous, and frankly, un-Apple-esque.

	▲	concinds 7 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Both Chrome and Firefox are already compliant, so I don't see it as onerous, but the full context of the list is indeed an extremely loud and clear "FUCK YOU, WE OWN YOU" to regulators and other browser vendors.
	▲	dagmx 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Which of the restrictions do you feel they don’t abide by? It looks like they meet all their own restrictions