Wealth inevitably concentrates in the hands of the elite no matter the economic conditions. There are plenty of failed states where all the wealth ended up in the hands of warlords and dictators.

It’s something that regularly has to be dealt with in societies separately from the economic situation.

▲

typeofhuman 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Exactly _how_ should society deal with it, and exactly _when_ should society deal with it?

▲

brokencode 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Opinions vary.

There are those who think massive concentration of wealth is not a problem at all and is just a product of healthy capitalism. Tax is theft, and individual property rights are above all else.

There are others who want some kind of communist revolution, where the entire structure of society and property ownership is changed. The workers should benefit from their work as much as the managers.

Personally, I feel like there's a middle ground to hit. We should be able to make changes to our current system in the US without needing anything too radical.

We have some good examples from the last century, such as trust busting, the New Deal, and the Great Society. These programs made major improvements without changing the country's fundamental economic system or growth trajectory.

▲

macintux 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> trust busting, the New Deal, and the Great Society.

I don't know what sea change it would take for today's GOP to even tepidly support any of these.

	▲	jimnotgym 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		An electorate that looks like it will certainly vote them out if they don't change