| ▲ | syndacks 3 hours ago | |
I can’t get over the range of sentiment on LLMs. HN leans snake oil, X leans “we’re all cooked” —- can it possibly be both? How do other folks make sense of this? I’m not asking for a side, rather understanding the range. Does the range lead you to believe X over Y? Are all new technologies so polarizing? | ||
| ▲ | coffeefirst an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Well, this is the internet. Arguing about everything is its favorite pastime. But generally yes, I think back to Mongo/Node/metaverse/blockchain/IDEs/tablets and pretty much everything has had its boosters and skeptics, this is just more... intense. Anyway I've decided to believe my own eyes. The crowds say a lot of things. You can try most of it yourself and see what it can and can't do. I make a point to compare notes with competent people who also spent the time trying things. What's interesting is most of their findings are compatible with mine, including for folks who don't work in tech. Oh, and one thing is for sure: shoving this technology into every single application imaginable is a good way to lose friends and alienate users. | ||
| ▲ | zahlman 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I'm not really convinced that anywhere leans heavily towards anything; it depends which thread you're in etc. It's polarizing because it represents a more radical shift in expected workflows. Seeing that range of opinions doesn't really give me a reason to update, no. I'm evaluating based on what makes sense when I hear it. | ||