Remix.run Logo
SantalBlush 9 hours ago

I think this is an uncharitable interpretation.

mucle6 9 hours ago | parent [-]

My interpretation is it would be less likely to happen near a wealthy neighborhood compared to a poor neighborhood. Why talk about race if its not about race?

dullcrisp 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Who said they were poor?

ryoshu 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Tulsa used to have a rich Black neighborhood.

toofy 4 hours ago | parent [-]

it’s amazing to me how few people know what happened there.

jasonwatkinspdx 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Because it is about race.

Please read the article I linked in another reply to you.

My neighborhood was prosperous when it was systematically stolen from the black people who built it. They literally razed a thriving business district. And then the land sat empty for decades, only in the end to be sold to property developers.

They used eminent domain to steal people's homes and businesses in a way that was blatantly criminal, but the victims had no recourse given the courts and entire rest of the political structure was complicit in the actions.

And variations of this story played out everywhere across America.

So yes, the fact that a neighborhood is historically black is relevant, because it shows the events of today are part of a continued arc of injustice.

enraged_camel 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The correlation is extremely strong, especially in places like Memphis. And nobody said this particular neighborhood is poor.