Another POV is, if datacenters are really constrained by power, by all means, offer users a discount when their queries utilize solar. Millions of Americans drive further to save cents to fill up their tanks - you can’t say there isn’t precedent among normal people to deal with this. The better question is, is it really a constraint?

▲

justincormack 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Doesnt really work, as the biggest cost is buying GPUs etc which has to be paid for, and leaving them idle when the sun isnt shining doesnt pay the purchase costs. Their are industries where this does work though.

▲

PunchyHamster 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The customers time is not flexible like that.

And every second GPU is not working, it's not making money

	▲	kube-system 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You both are talking about this stuff as if it is a new concept. Demand-based pricing is already commonplace for both electricity and compute. The demand for both compute and electricity is higher while people are awake and using them. But not all demand is realtime, and some will shift in response to prices.
	▲	Dylan16807 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> The customers time is not flexible like that. A lot of the super expensive queries are flexible. Especially the agentic coding ones. And higher use naturally follows the sun anyway. > And every second GPU is not working, it's not making money Some companies already have more chips than they can feed, so if that continues then sure why not let it idle part of the night.
	▲	doctorpangloss 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> The customers time is not flexible like that. haha how do you figure? with how much time people spend playing league of legends, watching tiktok and standing in line for "Free" shit, i think their time is actually quite flexible