Wild how many folks vibe code a thing and then claim to have created something that they ask us to plug into critical infrastructure with the ability to read, write, and execute.

No thanks.

▲

akhnid an hour ago | parent | next [-]

We have deifinitely used AI just like everyone else, but we are senior 4+ years of experience. Also Gitmore doesn't have the ability to read your code nor execute or write. We only get data from webhooks which are commits/ PR info with no code. Thanks for your Attention.

	▲	bitfilped 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		"Just like everyone else" is a crazy take on AI, no part of AI has ever touched my production environment nor will it ever. 4 years is also not senior at anything in my experience.

▲

pdyc 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

your privacy argument is valid but it is true for all new startups. If your repository on github than you are already giving your data to big corp why do u trust them? Backup your allegation on vibe code, i don't see any mention of vibe coding on website.

▲

thunderbong 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Where does this say it's vibe coded?

▲

onion2k 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's more wild that everyone's first reaction to seeing a new product is "probably vibe-coded AI slop". We held so little respect for the craft of software engineering that AI managed to kill it completely in about two years.

▲

LunaSea 2 hours ago | parent [-]

The fact that the websites pictures are all AI generated isn't exactly a great sign.

▲

onion2k 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Pictures on websites have always been either stolen from other sites a long time ago, then stock pictures from Unsplash or Pexels for a while, and now they're AI because that's just the easiest way to get images now. I don't think it's fair to developers to assume that the ones using AI generated images are also vibe-coding the software though. It's not like the ones writing hand-crafted artisanal code are also out with their cameras taking pictures for the website after all.

FWIW I don't disagree with you. I also assume people are vibe-coding things. I just don't think it's fair to assume that means the devs are taking that code and firing it straight up to a production server. They're probably fixing the problems and making it better. I know I do that in my code (most of the time.)

	▲	LunaSea an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I think it's very fair because it's a metric of how much effort and money has been invested into the project. Sites with generic stock photos were always a bad sign when dealing with websites in the past as well.