| ▲ | dheera 8 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
People seem to have the assumption that OpenAI and Anthropic dying would be synonymous with AI dying, and that's not the case. OpenAI and Anthropic spent a lot of capital on important research, and if the shareholders and equity markets cannot learn to value and respect that and instead let these companies die, new companies will be formed with the same tech, possibly by the same general group of people, thrive, and conveniently leave out the said shareholders. Google was built on the shoulders of a lot of infrastructure tech developed by former search engine giants. Unfortunately the equity markets decided to devalue those giants instead of applaud them for their contributions to society. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You weren’t around pre Google were you? The only thing Google learned from other search engines is what not to do - like rank based on the number of times a keyword appeared and not to use expensive bespoked servers | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tootie 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Isn't it really the other way around? Not to say OpenAI and Anthropic haven't done important work, but the genesis of this entire market was paper on attention that came out of Google. We have the private messages inside OpenAI saying they needed to get to market ASAP or Google would kill them. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||