So that they can pay 100x more expenses for.. no gain? They would pay an arm just for traffic.

CloudFlare is free/cheap and hey presto, no servers to manage!

herewulf 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

And when your Cloudflare site is down, most of the Internet is down too! There's no downside!

Counterpoint: that would require using CloudFlare.

That is, in my opinion, far superior to using a single server ran by "someone".

	▲	encrypted_bird 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I guess that is the beauty of opinions: they can be different from person to person. In my case, I would rather avoid CloudFlare if possible.