There are arguments aplenty that schooling and a minimum amount of healthcare are public goods, as are roads built on public land (the government owns most roads after all).

What is the justification for considering data centers capable of running LLMs to be a public good?

There are many counter examples of things many people use but are still private. Clothing stores, restaurants and grocery stores, farms, home appliance factories, cell phone factories, laundromats and more.

▲

reverserdev 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Libraries with books are likely considered public goods right?

Why not an LLM datacenter if it also offers information? You could say it's the public library of the future maybe.

▲

zdragnar 11 hours ago | parent [-]

Not all libraries are publicly owned or accessible. Most are run by local municipalities because they wouldn't exist otherwise.

Data centers clearly can exist without being owned by the public.

	▲	bjt 10 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So can bookstores.

▲

wahnfrieden 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

a distinction: the data centers have become the means of production, unlike clothing from a store

	▲	zdragnar 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		How is that distinct from any of my other examples which listed factories? Very few factories in the US are publicly owned; citing data centers as places of production merely furthers the argument that they should remain private.