Even if some critics of AA are committing that fallacy, debunking a weaker argument when a stronger argument exists is ineffective.

The implicit argument is that AA's largest challenge is a coordination problem. It's not. It's a clash in values and a fight over zero-sum rewards.

▲

anon84873628 13 hours ago | parent [-]

The argument is that critics of AA are committing the Fallacy of Composition. Specifically when saying that since giving out scholarships doesn't result in equal educational outcomes, then we should stop giving out scholarships.

I am with the author on this one. Creating better educational outcomes (for all students) is a coordination problem.

▲

skibidithink 12 hours ago | parent [-]

Critics are typically saying that giving out scholarships limited by race is racially discriminatory.

	▲	jibal 9 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This doesn't address the question and adds to it a misrepresentation of the facts.