Linux didn't aim to be an OS in the consumer sense (it is entirely an OS in an academic sense - in scientific literature OS == kernel, nothing else).The "consumer" OS is GNU/Linux or Android/Linux.

▲

delta_p_delta_x 13 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> it is entirely an OS in an academic sense - in scientific literature OS == kernel, nothing else

No, the academic literature makes the difference between the kernel and the OS as a whole. The OS is meant to provide hardware abstractions to both developers and the user. The Linux world shrugged and said 'okay, this is just the kernel for us, everyone else be damned'. In this view Linux is the complete outlier, because every other commercial OS comes with a full suite of user-mode libraries and applications.

▲

i80and 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There really isn't that much GNU on a modern Linux system, proportionately.

▲

dontlaugh 17 hours ago | parent [-]

Exactly, Gnome/Linux or KDE/Linux would make a lot more sense.

▲

pndy 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Both are being baked

https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=gnomeos

https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=kdelinux

The question is if either will catch any interest and if so, what will happen to regular distributions.

▲

graemep 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Except that it can be both and more: you can have Gnome, KDE, and other DEs and libraries installed and use app based on all of them simultaneously.

	▲	dontlaugh 13 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Sure, although every distro has a default. systemd/Linux maybe? Lots of things are more significant than GNU, either way.