I don't understand what your argument is.

It seems to be "people keep saying the models are good"?

That's true. They are.

And the reason people keep saying it is because the frontier of what they do keeps getting pushed back.

Actual, working, useful code completion in the GPT 4 days? Amazing! It could automatically write entire functions for me!

The ability to write whole classes and utility programs in the Claude 3.5 days? Amazing! This is like having a junior programmer!

And now, with Opus 4.5 or Codex Max or Gemini 3 Pro we can write substantial programs one-shot from a single prompt and they work. Amazing!

But now we are beginning to see that programming in 6 months time might look very different to now because these AI system code very differently to us. That's exactly the point.

So what is it you are arguing against?

I think you said you didn't like that people are saying the same thing, but in this post it seems more complicated?