| |
| ▲ | yunwal 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The culture on discords tend to be way better than anywhere else on the internet, but discord really sucks to use. Somehow still doesn’t have a usable search, really underpowered notifications control, they have the worst pop ups imaginable that seem to just float on top of the whole interface and make it impossible to use. I really wish something better would come along. | | |
| ▲ | NooneAtAll3 8 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > Somehow still doesn’t have a usable search worst part is that it used to :/ | |
| ▲ | Seattle3503 19 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I wish Discord had a betrer account switcher on mobile. I have a realname account for friends ana family, and another I use with randos. | |
| ▲ | esseph 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It can do per channel and per server notifications for all messages, @mentions, or none. What else would you want? | | |
| ▲ | ravikapoor101 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I also want levels of notifications.
Especially emergency one - Some channels are super critical and I want to be notified immediately, give me a popup, ring my phone, override if my phone is on mute, then call me.
Kind of like pagerduty. | |
| ▲ | antiframe 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Arbitrary regex matching. Something I use in IRC often. |
|
| |
| ▲ | bookofjoe 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | 99% of the population hasn't a clue what Discord is/does | | |
| ▲ | AngryData 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think the only people who don't know what discord anymore is the 50+ crowd. Atleast 50% of the randos I talk with online have discord as their preferred method for texting and voice communication and immediately want to switch to it if possible. And if older people actually cared about doxxing themselves with every conversation they would probably have a higher percentage too. | | |
| ▲ | bsimpson 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I don't know what the right way to handle intersecting identities is. Most of my online identities were started when I was in college and was happy to have them tied to my real name. (This is also when Facebook was popular, still good, and college-kids-only.) Since then, cancel culture et. al. has made me more wary of having my identity-adjacent usernames show up in hobbies like gaming. If I want to be myname in some Discord servers and anonoguy in others, is there a safe way to enforce that boundary? What about if I want to work on gaming-related open source projects or 3D prints? As the internet moves to logged-in-and-social-by-default, it's hard to know which identity to use for which service. Moreover, when things are constantly leaking/being hacked, I don't know that I want any service to know that anonoguy and myname are personas of the same individual. And as LLMs become the standard, I'm not sure any of this is defensible. I imagine in a decade's time, it will be trivial for an LLM to go "this account and that account have similar interests/references/ways of typing - they must be the same person." | |
| ▲ | badc0ffee 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm (barely) under 50, but I kind of hate it. I have no idea how to handle the un-threaded flood of messages, and much prefer something like Reddit, message boards, or even FB groups. I felt the same way about IRC back in the day and never got into it. I use Slack at work, but at least there I have a workable plan: no notifications for most channels, read or at least skim all messages in every channel by EOD, don't read it outside of business hours unless I get a DM. Also, absolutely never join the chatty #random type channels. | |
| ▲ | csomar 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | He is not wrong though a bit off. Discord has 200MAU. So 97% of the global population probably have no idea what Discord is. People massively underestimate the scale of whatsapp/facebook/tiktok (billions of MAU) |
| |
| ▲ | rootusrootus 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As someone with two teenage kids, I would wager that this is highly age-dependent, and that it is exactly reversed the younger you go. My guess is 99% of the under-25 population uses Discord daily and has never had a Facebook account. | | |
| ▲ | pbhjpbhj 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | In which country? The young adults in my UK family aren't using Discord. They don't use Facebook (except to keep up with older family/associates) either though. | | |
| ▲ | rootusrootus 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | US. What are they using in UK? WhatsApp? That kinda counts as Facebook, I suppose. But then again, is WhatsApp really a direct competitor with Discord? By the numbers, Discord is definitely more popular in the US, though it is pretty popular in the UK too. | |
| ▲ | qwertywert_ 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are you sure they don't? How would you know? Every intern I've worked with uses discord |
|
| |
| ▲ | bawolff 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The majority of the population has no idea what the trendsetters are doing before it becomes mainstream. But if you include other group msg platforms as the same thing (whatsapp, fb messenger, etc) i imagine most people know. | | |
| ▲ | justinhj 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think there's a much higher barrier to entry to Discord than Facebook. It won't become mainstream unless it significantly changes. |
| |
| ▲ | mjevans 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Discord is the 'AOL (1990s)' of the 2020s. (clearly aspects where that fails, but as a social media?) | |
| ▲ | barishnamazov 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You probably mean, 99% of anyone older than 25. | | | |
| ▲ | 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | poszlem 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Which is likely why it's so good still. The usenet before the eternal September. | |
| ▲ | majormajor 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | In the US this is likely a wildly high overestimate because a huge percentage of the population plays video games at least casually and it has a very large mindshare (if not necessarily daily use for everyone) in that domain. Moving into things like sports and what we would've called the "general blogosphere" in 2010 quite rapidly too. I kinda hate it since it's hard to discover, but at least Google can't direct a million bots to it either that easily yet... | |
| ▲ | izzylan 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Given that I recently joined a leatherworking Discord comprised of individuals pretty much the exact opposite of my demographic, I believe this is just plain wrong. My guess would be near half, probably a 60/40 split. |
| |
| ▲ | emodendroket 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > 3. Post history being public meant that you could get banned/brigaded for your comments on a totally different subreddit (i.e. bots autobanning you on one subreddit for posting on another subreddit). You can make it private now. Personally I think this is a bit of a misfeature since it ends up helping all the low-activity users showing up to post political agitprop in local subreddits, thinly-veiled advertisers, etc., but they changed it. | | |
| ▲ | esseph 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not really, you can just Google search and find all their posts and comments. | | |
| |
| ▲ | hinkley 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I wonder if the act of switching between discord servers works better with our homo erectus brains. You visit your sister who moved to the next village over, and you hang out in that context until it’s time to go home. You go hang out with the stone shapers because you’re a Neolithic nerd and you think rocks are cool but you have the find motor skills of a dying walrus. Having all of your social circle mashed together on the internet is like a family reunion at a convention in the same room as your high school reunion. It’s… a lot. | | |
| ▲ | kulahan 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think this is almost certainly true. People aren’t built to be acceptable to an audience the size of a football stadium, they’re built to be acceptable to a hundred or so people at a time. If you can comfortably context-switch, it’s probably a much easier lifestyle. I know that for me, at least, I like having one server where the comedy is not PC, one server where people seem to be a little more philosophical, one server for my real life friends, one server full of leftoids and one server full of rightards, etc. | |
| ▲ | bsimpson 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's funny to see how communities shard. In the plastic instrument games genre, there are some Discords where any wisp of using commercial music will be met with a stern reaction and potential ban. There are others that will link you to Drives full of thousands of songs from old games. The same people are in both groups. | | |
| ▲ | throwaway713 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sort of like the people who work in big tech and the people who post on Hacker News. You'd think the intersection is an empty set, but it's probably pretty large. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Muromec 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Whatsapp, viber, line and tg groups are very much a thing too. Everybody is a chat of their apartment complex and district it seems | | |
| ▲ | _alternator_ 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why doesn’t Signal have the same mindspace that these (imo) marginal apps have? It’s actually private. I wonder if people find it hard to use or something… | | |
| ▲ | bsimpson 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Does Signal scale? Until recently, I think the only way to join a Signal was to be explicitly added by a member. It doesn't have all the channels etc. of something like Discord. It doesn't have enough mindshare by normies either. In San Francisco, my entire social graph was on Signal. In NYC, I'm the weirdo that uses Signal for everything. Most locals seem to only use it for things that they explicitly want to be private. Among Euro friends, only the ones with ties to the US/tech industry use it. | | | |
| ▲ | lukeschlather 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Signal by design doesn't have moderation and server-side conversations, it's not suitable for large groups. | |
| ▲ | __turbobrew__ 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Signal doesn’t have channels (text, voice) which I think is a big one. | |
| ▲ | mbgerring 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It does in the Bay Area |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | bsimpson 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Slack had the ability to be Discord, but they explicitly decided they wanted to be business-only. React was the first open-source community I knew of that outgrew/got kicked off of Slack and moved to Discord. Now, it seems Slack is only used by companies, and occasionally by smaller groups (apartment buildings, school parents, etc) where someone in the group knows Slack from work and doesn't know it's hostile to non-businesses. Discord was the opposite. I was working on an open source initiative at Google at the time, and the Discord folks openly welcomed us. They even gave us someone's contact info, in case we had needs they weren't addressing. This was when it was still targeted just for gaming, but they were very welcoming of OSS projects using it too! As I write this, I realize that Discord is what "Google Apps for your Domain" was and Slack is the "Google Workspace" it became. | |
| ▲ | Y_Y 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | finger comes to mind, LinkedIn is almost a shit version of this |
|