| ▲ | purpleflame1257 9 hours ago |
| Venkatesh Rao offers the following definition of the "Fourth World" Fourth world: Parts of the developed world that have collapsed past third-world conditions because industrial safety nets have simultaneously withered from neglect/underfunding, and are being overwhelmed by demand, but where pre-modern societal structures don’t exist as backstops anymore. This is what this story reminds me of. |
|
| ▲ | HPsquared 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Isn't that basically what happened to the USSR? (Yes not technically "first world" but highly industrial and bureaucratic) |
| |
| ▲ | trelane 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | First World was US/NATO aligned. Second World was USSR/Warsaw Pact aligned. Third world was unaffiliated with either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World | | |
| ▲ | yieldcrv 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think this is relevant because the colloquialism of it meaning "developed" versus "undeveloped" doesn't work when you try to build on top of it it's impossible to build on what Third World means or add lore like Fourth World when the definition is on a shaky and now non-existent foundation, while much of the unaffiliated world is highly developed now. | | |
| ▲ | trelane 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes. Also, fitting the USSR into the extended framework, by not recognizing that it already was in the framework to begin with. IIRC Wikipedia says the term was coined ca. 1950s, so it could be argued that the USSR's decline was already factored into the term. | | |
| ▲ | QuercusMax 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | > IIRC Wikipedia says the term was coined ca. 1950s, so it could be argued that the USSR's decline was already factored into the term. What? The Soviets got the bomb in 1949 and launched Sputnik in 1957. That makes no sense. | | |
| ▲ | trelane 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | That success was not evenly distributed. | | |
| ▲ | QuercusMax 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Regardless, the Soviet Union was very far from collapsing in the 1950s. Again, what are you talking about? |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | mothballed 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | People in the USSR at least had the good fortune of already living in a world where they were highly adept at recycling and barter and maintenance, and in the case of the chechens also community self defense. I think most of America would be fucked as most people don't know to how to do anything but their job plus buy things with money from their job. The top 25% of handy people might be able to change their own oil and that is it (not that they can't learn more, but it takes time). | | |
| ▲ | potato3732842 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | >I think most of America would be fucked as most people don't know to how to do anything Most of America would be substantially less fucked than the slice of mostly officer workers who mostly have enough money that "spend money rather than upskill or barter" is their default mode of operation you see via HN. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nephihaha 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Someone already assigned "Fourth World" to stateless nations, so it's probably fifth world by now. The developed world does have decaying infrastructure but moving it between the private and state sector has caused problems. As has lockdown and other international policies. Our local government's main interest seems to be in shutting streets off and designing bad cycle infrastructure that is little use to cyclists (I am one by the way). It is letting our streets fall to pieces and spending lots of money erecting physical blocks. |
|
| ▲ | geysersam 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is just silly. The German train system has problems. Does that mean total civilizational collapse? No, it doesn't. |
| |
| ▲ | busterarm 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Collapse is the other end of the spectrum. This is an institution whose practices/policies only serve itself instead of its customers/purpose. It's progress, taken to its extreme. From a certain point of view it's effectively the same as collapse. |
|
|
| ▲ | sandblast2 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I am sorry but this is not Rao's but Umair Haque's and he considers the UK and the US Fourth World. |
| |
|
| ▲ | gkoz 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| There's no indication of any failures of the industrial layer in this story. The train was working, it didn't crash into anything, everyone was safe. |
| |
