> I mean if you feel kidnapped because your train connection didn't work out

It's not "your train connection didn't work out", it's "you were planning to go somewhere, and the train took you somewhere else entirely, much farther away than when you started, and gave you no way out of this, and not even an apology or explanation". This is absolutely comparable to a form of kidnapping.

▲

locallost 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes because after kidnapping you are always allowed to leave the vehicle you were kidnapped with and continue with your day.

Sorry, but no.

▲

tsimionescu 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you got into an Uber and they took you to some completely different place, many km away from your destination, and didn't let you get out of the vehicle until they got there, would you not say that they kidnapped you? Would you not be tempted to call the police and press charges, even if they did tell you that they would let you go out once they reached their destination?

	▲	locallost 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You do understand how a train works? * It has tracks so it cannot go anywhere it wants to go * It can only let passengers go at certain places, these are called stations So no, I would not compare it to a random Uber driver that takes me somewhere random on a whim. I wouldn't call the police if an Uber took me on a different road if the original road was closed. Etc. Please start making sense, thank you. I'm done.

▲

abigail95 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

If you want to continue the analogy via consequences, it's not a defense to kidnapping to say you let them go at the end.

▲

locallost 6 hours ago | parent [-]

For it to be a kidnapping there needs to be a realistic threat you will not be let go. Have a nice day.

	▲	abigail95 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Just so you know I was offended at the use of the term kidnapping from the article but for different reasons.