| ▲ | UnmappedStack 15 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a really interesting view, but I'm not sure I agree. So many amazing projects are truly free without the goal of profit yet their maintainers still do amazing work. I feel like part of the reason this works is because often the load is split between several maintainers (of which I hope to onboard soon, and have one or two offers already from people to contribute) and also the fact it's genuinely something enjoyable to work on (of course, to the extent it's not too stressful and overworked). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | NitpickLawyer 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
There's a difference between awesome projects that don't have a recurring cost (i.e. open source software that users run themselves) and a search engine. You cannot physically run a search engine without real-world costs today. Those funds need to come from somewhere. And offering a good product at scale costs a lot of money. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | YetAnotherNick 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Examples? If you are going to say something like linux, almost every developer gets paid to contribute to linux(I remember 95% commits have company attribution). Same with postgres etc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||