| ▲ | dotancohen 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These look great for people who like to plan their tasks. I found that when I plan my tasks and plan my day and plan my time bubbles, I spend so much time planning that I don't have time left for doing. This planner explicitly encourages having only three planned tasks for the day. What's wrong with just doing those tasks without writing them down? I ask in full seriousness, as someone struggling decades with how to plan and then do personal and professional tasks. I ask as a question, not as a criticism. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | rjh29 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I feel like the entire productivity thing is broscience. There's no study for it (the 'three items' idea), it just feels like the right thing to do. Quite often the people making these tools are not particularly productive themselves. And nobody I know has ever stuck to one productivity system for very long outside of "todo list text file" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Brajeshwar 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Writing down is a sign-post for you to stay in your lane. Otherwise, you were working on a task and something fail in your terminal; by evening you realize you spent the last 4 hours fixing your entire dotfiles, fixing environment, shell, and what-not to move easily between machines smoothly (you also realized you are not moving machines anytime soon). The Frog to Eat that you wrote down yesterday for today, and the other tasks that has to be done today is there for you to see - bright, and clear - helps you steer back when your minds starts to wander, phone distracts, and HN is tempting for more comments. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||