| ▲ | heavyset_go 13 hours ago | |||||||
There's also a risk of your DeviceTree getting pruned from the kernel in X years when it's decided that "no one uses that board anymore", which is something that's happened to several boards I bought in the 2010's, but not something that's happened to any PC I've ever owned. | ||||||||
| ▲ | jrmg 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It’s weirded me out for a long time that we’ve gone from ‘we will probe the hardware in a standard way and automatically load the appropriate drivers at boot’ ideal we seemed to have settled on for computers in the 2000s - and still use on x86 - back to ‘we’ll write a specific description file for every configuration of hardware’ for ARM. | ||||||||
| ▲ | MarsIronPI 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Isn't this one of the benefits of ACPI? That the kernel asks the motherboard for the hardware information that on ARM SoCs is stored in the device tree? | ||||||||
| ||||||||