if we use your logic then every law written would be failure since at some point people would discover loophole/flaw that would get abused

the fix is we use more ambiguous words or just stronger government control

see how China "control" capitalist on this case if you want absolute government control

▲

websiteapi 18 hours ago | parent [-]

isn't it true though that laws that have frequently abused loopholes that effectively go against the spirit of the law are indeed failures? isn't that the entire purpose of having lawmakers who are constantly evaluating such things?

	▲	makeitdouble 15 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You could see it as a failure to enforce the spirit of the law. Judges have the power to make it right and refuse the loopholes.
	▲	tonyhart7 18 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Yeah that is the point of having law maker my point is making a law that a "future proof" is impossible, since guess what???? Human just cant account for every possible future scenario