Remix.run Logo
fc417fc802 3 hours ago

China was playing industrial catch up. They didn't have to (for example) reinvent semiconductors from first principles. They will surely support some form of IP law once they have been firmly established at the cutting edge for a while.

I'm no fan of the current state of things but it's absurd to imply that the existence of IP law in some form isn't essential if you want corporations to continue much of their R&D as it currently exists.

Without copyright in at least some limited form how do you expect authors to make a living? Will you have the state fund them directly? Do you propose going back to a patronage system in the hopes that a rich client just so happens to fund something that you also enjoy? Something else?

snickerbockers an hour ago | parent | next [-]

>a patronage system in the hopes that a rich client just so happens to fund something that you also enjoy

How is that any different from hoping that a corporate conglomerate happens to fund something i also enjoy?

tedk-42 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Imagine our human ancestors claiming IP infringement when one guy copied fire making from another.

fc417fc802 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

A perfect illustration of why IP should never be regarded as a moral right. It exists for the benefit of society as a whole. Thus the laws creating it need to be tuned with that as the explicit (and only) goal. Mickey Mouse law must not be permitted.

phs318u 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe this is just me, but the second I read your comment I envisioned a “caveman” sitcom.

nmz 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is an LLM human now?