| ▲ | whatshisface 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
It is not company property. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | anigbrowl 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
But it's the company's legal department which would evaluate that claim. Because it's a legal claim. Licenses aren't magic spells, they're social agreements and non-executive employees don't want to get in trouble for making executive decisions. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | treesknees 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That really depends. A company can still own the copyright to the code that they’ve written, even if it’s licensed with GPL. It’s an asset that is transferred if the company is sold, etc, so yes, it’s actually company property. The GPL grants rights to use and distribute, but does not grant ownership. It’s not suddenly in the public domain. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Aurornis 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Support staff or even engineers are not in a position to be making that call. It’s a legal department decision, even if it seems obvious to you. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | abigail95 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative works are owned by those who create them. What copyright says you can do with them depends on the specifics, but the general case is true. | |||||||||||||||||||||||