AutoLISP is how I learned LISP back in the 80's. I probably used it for about twenty years. I wrote a massive amount of code to automate ACAD use in three areas: Schematic Capture, PCB Layout and Broadcast Facility design and Construction.

The first two were complimentary. Before that I was laying out PCB's by hand using (who can remember?) Vector tools and Xacto knives. Switching to ACAD with AutoLISP-based automation was a game changer.

Broadcast facilities are not very different from data centers, in the sense that you have loads of racks filled with equipment. I would say that one of the key differences was that the equipment was not as homogenous as it might be in data centers. Back then I was very involved in some massive studio projects, both in terms of facility design (not the architecture, the design and installation of the technology) and custom software/hardware for the same industry. Once again, in the early days all wiring diagrams were being done the old fashion way, with pencil and D-size paper on a drawing table.

I started with ACAD version 1.0 or 1.1, I can't remember. This ran on an 8086 CPM computer build on an S-100 frame. It actually had an 8087 math coprocessor board and another board with 512K (you read that right) of RAM to mount as a RAM disk. The computer had 64K of RAM. So, yeah, early ACAD ran on a system with 64K of RAM.

The studio AutoLISP software was the most extensive. It took advantage of 3D features to do such things route cables between equipment in different racks and rooms as well as compute the required cable lengths. It would generate cable cut lists and labels for the wiring crew, etc.

This also included managing a symbol library for these designs, much as a tool like KiCAD or Altium (which has now officially gone to shit!) manages both schematic symbol and PCB footprints for ECAD work. The equipment definitions included such things as input/output signal types, required cable type, connector types, wiring schematic and rack mount models (for laying out where in the racks each device would be installed).

This is work that I evolved over years as we designed and built many installations across the country. It was a valuable internal tool with competitive advantages. We left that industry behind a very long time ago, but I remember that time fondly. Technology was evolving at breakneck speed and there were incredible opportunities to develop innovative solutions across the entire technology stack, from embedded all the way up to custom equipment.

This is beautiful. Schematic capture, PCB layout, broadcast facilities - and 3D cable routing with auto-generated cut lists and labels. That's the workflow taken to its full potential. 64K RAM, 8086 with math coprocessor, ACAD 1.0. Memory was such a pain back then. I eventually got a Quadra 700 (68MB) with A/UX - Unix on a Mac felt like the future. Fun fact: we got Betz's original XLISP (C) running in WASM for a benchmark. It destroys my Rust version. But speed was never the point - the CAD workflow was. And yours proves the pattern scaled far beyond what I did with electrical schematics.