| ▲ | anthk 8 hours ago | |||||||
> The conquistadors and chroniclers all saw the Americas through the lens of the chivalric literature they loved. More like the opposite. The Golden Age of Spain was all about making fun on the knight from the "New Man" making wealth from the Americas. Heck, it's the main theme from Don Quixote. The old, idealistic, outdated, Medieval wannabe-knight (hidalgo meant hijo-de-algo, son of something, hereditary titles) vs the simpleton but grounded peasant from the New World era. Also tons of peasants tried to travel overseas to make good money, and maybe scaled up their status to the ones from a merchant. As Cervantes itself was a limp from a war which was something reminiscing old romantic but bullshit times, with Don Quixote you have the clear message that the warrior/knights were looked down against the traveler making wealth from overseas. Kinda like a far west outdated "Justiciero" in the US from an aristocratic background compared to some middle-level educated hick but with a prosperous job in the 50's thanks to making good money from trade in a fish port. | ||||||||
| ▲ | AlotOfReading 6 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Don Quixote came out nearly a century after Cortes and is often cited as specifically having killed the genre/culture it was parodying. Look at how much Diaz talks about Amadis with full seriousness. | ||||||||
| ||||||||