| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 8 hours ago |
| I think everyone, including myself, should be extremely hesitant to respond to marketing emails with profanity-laden moralism. It’s not about purity testing, it’s about having the level of introspection to understand that people do lots of things for lots of reasons. “Just fuck you. Fuck you all.” is not an appropriate response to presumptively good people trying to do cool things, even if the cool things are harmful and you desperately want to stop them. |
|
| ▲ | trinsic2 7 hours ago | parent [-] |
| It sounds like you are trying to label this issue in such a way as to marginalize someones view. We got to this point by not looking at these problems for what they are. Its not wrong to say something is wrong and it needs to be addressed. Doing cool things, without looking at whether or not we should doesn't feel very responsible too me esp. if it impacts society in a negative way. |
| |
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, I'm trying to marginalize the author's view. I think that “Just fuck you. Fuck you all.” is a bad view which does not help us see problems for what they are nor analyze negative impacts on society. For example, Rob seems not to realize that the people who instructed an AI agent to send this email are a handful of random folks (https://theaidigest.org/about) not affiliated with any AI lab. They aren't themselves "spending trillions" nor "training your monster". And I suspect the AI labs would agree with both Rob and me that this was a bad email they should not have sent. | | |
| ▲ | discreteevent 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's a smarmy sycophantic email addressing him personally and co-opting his personal achievements written by something he dislikes. This would feel really fucked up. It's true that anger is not always a great response but this is one of those occasions where it fits exactly. |
|
|