| ▲ | gpm 8 hours ago | |
If we start creating more `&... T` ptr types I wonder if a future edition changes `*const T` to `&raw T` for consistency... | ||
| ▲ | kibwen 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I'm hoping that languages move away from the sigil-ified legacy of C treating pointers as special syntax and just start calling these `Ref<T>`, `PtrConst<T>`, etc. | ||
| ▲ | steveklabnik 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Ehhh it’s already consistent: ones with & borrow, ones without do not. | ||