| ▲ | y-curious 11 hours ago |
| Where is this spirit when AWS takes a FOSS project, puts it in the cloud and monetizes it? |
|
| ▲ | Snild 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It exists, hence e.g. AGPL. But for most open source licenses, that example would be within bounds. The grandparent comment objected to not respecting the license. |
| |
| ▲ | fweimer 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | The AGPL does not prevent offering the software as a service. It's got a reputation as the GPL variant for an open-core business model, but it really isn't that. Most companies trying to sell open-source software probably lose more business if the software ends up in the Debian/Ubuntu repository (and the packaging/system integration is not completely abysmal) than when some cloud provider starts offering it as a service. |
|
|
| ▲ | mrwrong 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| you are saying X, but a completely different group of people didn't say Y that other time! I got you!!!! |
| |
| ▲ | y-curious 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s fair to call out that both aspects are two sides of the same coin.
I didn’t try to “get” anyone | | |
| ▲ | mrwrong 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | um, no it's not. you have fallen into the classic web forum trap of analyzing a heterogenous mix of people with inconsistent views as one entity that should have consistent views |
|
|
|
| ▲ | oblio 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Fairly sure it's the same problem and the main reason stronger licenses are appearing or formerly OSS companies closing down their sources. |