| ▲ | satvikpendem 7 hours ago | |||||||
Then just use 0.75 or 0.5x speed? I don't understand this question. | ||||||||
| ▲ | anywhichway 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It isn't just how fast or slow it is. Reading at a slow pace gives you time to think in a way that is flexible from sentence to sentence. To borrow the same analogy from the article, image trying to savor a meal where someone else was deciding when you take each bite. Even at a slow pace, the rigidness of the pace and your lack of fine control would still pose a problem with giving each bite it's rightful consideration. That being said I love audio books and think I would struggle to apply this article's advice in my own life. Slowing down your audiobook is still a step in that direction, though I sometimes find that slowing it down can cause my mind to wander and my comprehension goes down and not up. | ||||||||
| ▲ | retsibsi 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Then just use 0.75 or 0.5x speed? I think this often sounds unsettling (like the reader is drunk or otherwise impaired), and anyway the listener doesn't need more time to recognise each individual word -- they want time to take in sentences and paragraphs. | ||||||||
| ||||||||