| ▲ | phantasmish 9 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
One really appreciates the “pocket” label of this format if one wears suits, sport coats, or blazer jackets, or almost any of several styles of coat that fall under the category of “overcoat”: these books really were pocket size! For those pockets, that is. The thicker ones are pushing it, but the ones closer to 250 pages fit neatly in a blazer pocket. Thicker ones are fine in the cavernous pockets of many overcoats (though, hell, so are trade-size books) (Phones work better in a jacket, too—I think we made a mistake running away from that clothing style, they’re like wearable purses that also make you look nicer. Sure suits are kinda wasteful with the way the jackets get downgraded if the pants are destroyed, but odd jackets we should have held on to!) | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pavon 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
They also fit nicely in the back pocket of jeans, and leveled-out sitting on your wallet. I pretty much always had a book there from middle school until sometime after I was married. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | esseph 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Very much ready for the east coast in particular to move away from the suit nonsense. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||