Remix.run Logo
thundergolfer 10 hours ago

> There's really nothing inherently wrong about the format.

"Our conventional response to all media, namely that it is how they are used that counts, is the numb stance of the technological idiot. For the 'content' of a medium is like the juicy piece of meat carried by the burglar to distract the watchdog of the mind...The effects of technology do not occur at the level of opinions or concepts, but alter sense ratios or patterns of perception steadily and without any resistance. The serious artist is the only person able to encounter technology with impunity, just because he is an expert aware of the changes in sense perception." — Marshal McLuhan, Understanding Media

subdavis 10 hours ago | parent [-]

I feel like McLuhan is so thoroughly accepted as gospel now that it’s refreshing to see someone casually dismiss the idea out of hand like OC. I would love to see a serious exploration of the argument against McLuhan in 2025, just for fun.

raddan 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You mean aside from the fact that his quasi-mystical, self-important proclamations have no factual basis? I personally dislike how his ideas cast a cynical veneer over truly transformative changes without actually contributing anything useful to the conversation.

Who takes this stuff as gospel? Academics who study critical theory?

thundergolfer 4 hours ago | parent [-]

McLuhan is anything but a cynic. It sounds like you haven’t read him.

JSR_FDED 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I suspect he got right more than he got wrong.

Who is OC?

wffurr 8 hours ago | parent [-]

"Original Commenter"

I have not seen that particular jargon before but it rhymes with OP (Original Poster) that I was able to figure it out from context.

7 hours ago | parent [-]
[deleted]